For payment information, can we only disclose to covered entities?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, August 14, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q: When we are disclosing information for our own payment purposes, can we only disclose it to another covered entity?
A: No. The HHS commentary in the privacy rule makes it clear that covered entities may disclose PHI for payment purposes to any other entity, regardless of whether it is a covered entity. For example, a health care provider may disclose PHI to a financial institution in order to cash a check or to a health care clearinghouse to initiate electronic transactions.
The regulations define payment as the activities undertaken by
They further state that the activities of this definition relate to the individual to whom health care is provided. They include, but are not limited to, the following:
Payment activities include disclosures to collection agencies. The HHS commentary notes that a collection agency may require PHI to investigate and assess payment disputes for the covered entity. For example, the collection agency may need to know what services the covered entity rendered in order to resolve disputes about amounts due. The information necessary may vary, depending on the nature of the dispute. Such disclosures, however, are subject to the minimum necessary requirements, in that the covered entity must make reasonable efforts to limit disclosure to that information necessary to accomplish the purpose of the disclosure.
Psychotherapy notes cannot be disclosed for payment purposes unless an authorization is obtained from the individual who is the subject of the notes.
Accountings of disclosures do not need to include those made for treatment, payment, or health care operations.
Editor's note: Brought to you by attorneys Marty Baxter and Gretchen McBeath at Bricker and Eckler, LLP and The Quality Management Consulting Group, Ltd.. E-mail: mbaxter@bricker.com or gmcbeath@bricker.com
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched