Privacy notices for testing without an office visit
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, May 15, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q: We are a cardiology practice that has several stand-alone testing facilities. Is it necessary to hand patients the privacy notice and have them sign an acknowledgement of receipt when they have testing that requires no office visit?
A: First, whether patients make one visit or several has no bearing on whether they must sign an acknowledgement of receipt. What matters here is whether the provider-the testing facility-is a direct or an indirect treatment provider. While all health plans, providers, and some others are required to develop and make available a HIPAA-compliant privacy notice, only direct treatment providers are required to actively hand it out and obtain a one-time acknowledgement of receipt. Often, lab and testing facilities are defined as indirect treatment providers under HIPAA, so this is not required.
The notice of privacy practices, how it should be handled, who needs to get acknowledgements, and how to handle them still appears to cause confusion among covered entities. Here are a few reminders:
Editor's note: Answered by Kate Borten, CISSP, president of The Marblehead Group, in Marblehead, MA, and excerpted from the upcoming June 2003 issue of Briefings on HIPAA. This is not legal advice. Be sure to consult with your facility's legal counsel for legal matters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched