Survey shows almost half of facilities have not addressed all privacy requirements
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, April 24, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The privacy rule's compliance date passed two weeks ago, but 48% of organizations have yet to address all of the rule's requirements, according to the recent HIPAA Weekly Advisor Privacy Compliance Reader Survey.
Respondents listed lack of time as the biggest compliance obstacle (64%), and 60% said they are still working on business associate agreements (facilities have an additional year to develop HIPAA-compliant contracts). 45% said they are still developing policies and procedures.
Other results of the survey include the following:
- 45% of respondents said they have addressed all requirements and are in compliance
- 29% said they still haven't trained all employees
- 14% said lack of administrative buy-in and support is the biggest compliance obstacle
The survey was sent electronically April 18 to subscribers of HIPAA Weekly Advisor, and 527 people responded. Of those respondents, 41% were privacy officials, 23% were compliance officers, 21% were health information management professionals, and 11% were administrators. Others included office managers, risk managers, and information technology professionals.
Almost half of respondents worked at either hospitals (32%) or hospital systems (17%). Other settings included physician practices, long-term care facilities, and home health agencies.
Editor's note: Look for more survey results in future issues of HIPAA Weekly Advisor.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched