Q&A: How many people should be involved in reviewing a medical record?
CDI Strategies, April 14, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
A: With the current focus on greater efficiency, hospitals should consider the number of people reviewing precisely the same documentation but for different purposes. Utilization reviewers are screening documents for evidence of medical necessity; clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists are screening the documents to identify opportunities for the physician to consider greater specificity and clarification; and medical record coders are reviewing the same series of documents to assign accurate codes for the claim forms and to comply with the broad array of regulatory reporting requirements.
There is some evidence that the introduction of user-friendly CDI applications has prompted the integration of the CDI and UR specialist roles; most recently in the emergency department
Similarly, the introduction of computer-assisted coding (CAC) applications adds a new. Some CAC applications can highlight key clinical terms in selected documents for easy recognition by reviewers and coders. CAC applications can auto-assign an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code, which brings the value of concurrent coding into question. Developing a method for efficiently integrating a portion or all three primary review activities—UR, CDI, and concurrent coding—is a struggle for many in the healthcare industry, and there is no best practice approach rather facilities must examine each record review process and identify opportunities of collaboration, area of overlap, and develop effective policies to effectively manage the process.
Editor’s Note: This article is an excerpt from the book The Hospital Guide to Contemporary Utilization Review.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Coronavirus: 7 Infection Prevention Best Practices for Healthcare Settings
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Skills of effective case managers
- Complications from immobility by body system
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- E-mailed
-
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- Right- and left-brain learners: Strategies to facilitate hemisphere learning
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Q/A: Billing for DME
- Intake and output monitoring
- Hospitalists branch into perioperative medicine with preop assessments
- HIPAA Training Handbooks pick-a-pack!
- HCPro, Inc. Launches New HIPAA Products for Clinical Researchers
- Follow 72-hour and 24-hour rules
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched
