Q&A: How many people should be involved in reviewing a medical record?
CDI Strategies, April 14, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
A: With the current focus on greater efficiency, hospitals should consider the number of people reviewing precisely the same documentation but for different purposes. Utilization reviewers are screening documents for evidence of medical necessity; clinical documentation improvement (CDI) specialists are screening the documents to identify opportunities for the physician to consider greater specificity and clarification; and medical record coders are reviewing the same series of documents to assign accurate codes for the claim forms and to comply with the broad array of regulatory reporting requirements.
There is some evidence that the introduction of user-friendly CDI applications has prompted the integration of the CDI and UR specialist roles; most recently in the emergency department
Similarly, the introduction of computer-assisted coding (CAC) applications adds a new. Some CAC applications can highlight key clinical terms in selected documents for easy recognition by reviewers and coders. CAC applications can auto-assign an ICD-9 or ICD-10 code, which brings the value of concurrent coding into question. Developing a method for efficiently integrating a portion or all three primary review activities—UR, CDI, and concurrent coding—is a struggle for many in the healthcare industry, and there is no best practice approach rather facilities must examine each record review process and identify opportunities of collaboration, area of overlap, and develop effective policies to effectively manage the process.
Editor’s Note: This article is an excerpt from the book The Hospital Guide to Contemporary Utilization Review.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Prevent dehydration with nursing interventions
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Skills of effective case managers
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Performing a SWOT analysis
- Unsuccessful v. aborted/discontinued procedures
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- Q/A: Infusions in an interosseous line
- Q&A: ’Suggestive’ documentation could require clarification
- Hospital Billing from A to Z: 3- and 1-day rules
- Get to the heart of cardiac catheterization coding
- Don't bill 59025, 76818 separately without separate physician orders
- Documentation challenges for skin and dermatology coding
- Confusion Prevails Over M0102 and M0104
- Searched
