Q&A: How can we ensure the right documentation for a level of care recommendation?
CDI Strategies, January 28, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Q: As part of an integrated access management program, what medical documents are needed to perform a medical necessity review so that the access care coordinator (ACC) can offer a level of care recommendation to the physician?
A: The 2016 Outpatient Prospective Payment System rule states:
"The physician’s decision should be based on such complex medical factors as patient history and comorbidities, the severity of signs and symptoms, current medical needs, and the risk of an adverse event.”
But another important consideration should be whether the patient requires hospital-level care.
This is the crux of the review. For example, a patient may have an exacerbation of a chronic illness, but the ACC or case manager then needs to ask whether hospitalization is required to resolve the problem. If this is a new illness, does it require hospitalization to find out the source? (Auditors inevitably deny so-called work up hospitalizations if the testing could be performed on an outpatient basis.) Finally, the ACC or case manager must see medical documentation that states that the care the patient requires is expected to exceed two midnights, which CDI specialists should pay attention to.
Reviewers should consider the history of present illness, the severity of the signs and symptoms of the patient’s current medical condition, and the expectation of a two midnight stay, in addition to:
- The patient’s age
- Disease processes
- The medical predictability an adverse event
Also look at admitting orders. What are the patient’s current needs that require hospital-level care? What is the risk of not admitting the patient? I call this the “because clause”—if the patient is not admitted, given his history of pre-existing condition, he may be at risk for complication. During a CDI specialist’s regular record review he/she may note some indicators or clinical factors that could help the ACC or case management team. If so, there should be a process in place to help both teams facilitate open communication.
Editor’s Note: This question was answered by Stefani Daniels, RN, MSNA, CMAC, ACM, founder and managing partner of Phoenix Medical Management, Inc., in Pompano Beach, Florida. It was originally published in Case Management Insider.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- The consequences of an incomplete medical record
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Q&A: Pressure ulcer POA code confusion resolved
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- Searched