Q&A: Should we hardcode modifier -CT?
APCs Insider, January 15, 2016
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Q: Our radiology department is requesting that we add a new modifier to their charge description master (CDM), modifier –CT (computed tomography [CT] services furnished using equipment that does not meet each of the attributes of the National Electrical Manufacturers Association [NEMA] XR-29-2013 standard). They want this added to the CT scan line items, but they are not sure if it is for all of the items or only certain ones. Can you provide more information that might help us know how to proceed?
A: Each facility needs to have a discussion before you hardcode the modifier to the CDM. Modifier –CT is a new modifier for 2016 and the NEMA standard has to do with dose optimization and management. For CT scans that are performed on equipment that is non-compliant with this standard, the modifier must be reported on specific codes. The specific CPT codes are listed in Transmittal 3425 and the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 4, section 20.6.12.
A discussion is warranted if you have more than one CT scanner in use at your facility. This modifier is only applicable to scanners that don’t meet the requirement, and a payment reduction is involved when the modifier is reported. For CY 2016, CMS instituted a 5% reduction in payment when the modifier is reported, but the percentage increases for CY 2017 and beyond. So, if you have multiple scanners in use, you want to be sure that the modifier is only applied to those services provided on the non-compliant scanner/equipment.
Editor’s note: Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, seniorvice president of revenue integrity services at Revant Solutions,in Fort Lauderdale, Florida, answered this question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Joint Commission creates new Sentinel Event Alert for violence against healthcare workers
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Q/A: Correctly determining billing units for drugs
- Note from the instructor: CMS issues guidance on hospital inpatient admission order and certification requirements, Part I: Physician certification
- Complications from immobility by body system
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- E-mailed
-
- Joint Commission now allows partially-used oxygen canisters in 'full' rack
- Joint Commission and CMS Alignment: Restraint Management
- Initial vs. subsequent. New vs. established. Will it be an issue?
- Examine documentation for clinical indicators that provide context for MCCs
- Do not append modifier -52 to procedures involving equipment failure
- Dig into the details of wound care documentation
- Data gathering/reporting: One CDI specialist shares her hospital's methodology
- Communication strategies for nurse leaders
- CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards
- CMS and AMA documentation guidelines for E/M codes don't always agree
- Searched