News: Providers reluctant to join bundled payment initiatives, analysis says
CDI Strategies, December 23, 2015
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Some providers who entered bundled payment programs in their initial phase are more reluctant to continue to participate when they have financial risk, according to a new analysis conducted by Avalere Health.
As of October 1, 2015, 1,500 providers are participating in CMS’ voluntary Bundled Payment for Care Improvement (BPCI) program, according to the report. BPCI is a program in which hospitals, physician group practices, and post-acute care providers accept clinical and financial risk for patients over specified time frames.
Episodes are 30, 60, or 90 days long and providers are responsible for all clinical care provided to the patient over those timeframes. Prior to October 2015, participants could test conditions but not be responsible for spending above the target price, says Avalere. Participants received access to Medicare claims data and target prices.
CMS allows participating providers to select episodes to test from a group of 48 clinical conditions, Avalere says, which range from procedures to medical conditions. On average, each participant is testing episodes for nine unique clinical conditions.
The four most commonly tested conditions are lower extremity joint replacement, pneumonia, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, and congestive heart failure, according to the analysis. These top conditions represent about 18% of the 14,000 bundles in the demonstration. The diversity of conditions and participants will provide CMS with substantial information on the impacts of bundled payments as they review the demonstration results.
After the first phase of the program, CMS began introducing downside risk for the participants. As a result, only about 25% of the original participants elected to remain in the program. However, the experience could help prepare them for future alternative payment models, the report says.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- Complications from immobility by body system
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- Neurological checks for head injuries
- Understanding and coding for critical care services
- E-mailed
-
- Use caution when applying modifier -25
- Study: Patients equally satisfied with virtual encounters compared to in-person visits
- Pneumonia with a negative chest x-ray: Clinical diagnoses, physician documentation, and coding guidelines
- Correctly bill ancillary bedside procedures in addition to the room rate
- Coding Corner: Tips for reporting bronchoscopy procedures
- Searched
