Are coroners and medical examiners entitled to receive PHI?
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, March 28, 2003
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Q: Are coroners and medical examiners entitled to receive PHI?
A: A covered entity may disclose protected health information (PHI) without authorization to a coroner or medical examiner for the purpose of identifying a deceased person, determining a cause of death, or fulfilling other duties as authorized by law.
Covered entities are not required to remove information about persons other than the patient before disclosing the record.
According to HHS, coroners and medical examiners sometimes need psychotherapy notes to determine cause of death, such as in cases where suicide is suspected. So, the privacy rule permits coroners or medical examiners to obtain all PHI necessary to determine an individual's cause of death, including psychotherapy notes, without any consents or authorizations.
The rule makes it clear that where a hospital performs the duties of a coroner or medical examiner, the hospital's on-staff coroners can use PHI while conducting post-mortem investigations, and other hospital staff can analyze information associated with these investigations, for example, as part of the process of determining the cause of death.
A disclosure to a coroner or medical examiner should be included in an accounting of disclosures.
Editor's note: Brought to you by attorneys Marty Baxter and Gretchen McBeath at Bricker and Eckler, LLP (http://www.bricker.com) and The Quality Management Consulting Group, Ltd. (http://www.qmcg.com). E-mail: mbaxter@bricker.com or gmcbeath@bricker.com
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched