CMS completes another round of successful ICD-10 end-to-end testing
APCs Insider, June 5, 2015
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
By Steven Andrews
CMS has completed another round of successful ICD-10 end-to-end testing, with the acceptance rate climbing substantially from the first effort in January.
In the latest test, conducted from April 27 to May 1, CMS accepted 88% of claims submitted, with only 2% rejected due to an invalid ICD-10-CM/PCS code, down from 3% in the January test. In the first test, CMS accepted 81% of claims, prompting the AMA to predictably portend disaster for an October 1 transition.
This isn't the only positive trend in the latest testing data. Less than 1% of claims were rejected due to invalid ICD-9-CM codes, while this number was at 3% in January. Approximately 10% of the remaining claims were rejected due to:
- Incorrect NPI, Health Insurance Claim Number, or submitter ID
- Dates of service outside the range valid for testing
- Invalid HCPCS codes
- Invalid place of service codes
If claims were submitted today with those errors, they'd also be rejected. Providers presumably will be able to iron out those errors before implementation. If you focus on just the coding-related errors, we're left at 97% acceptance, precisely the rate CMS accepts today.
CMS found no issues with front-end systems for professional and supplier claims, and only identified one issue related to system edits for inpatient claims, which will be resolved before the next round of tests in July. CMS also noted that the error identified in January regarding home health claims was fixed for this round.
How ready are you for ICD-10? HCPro is presenting weekly ICD-10 refresher webcasts all summer to prepare coders and providers for the upcoming transition. The webcasts cover a variety of topics and specialties, information on anatomy, documentation, and tricky coding conventions. For more information, visit HCMarketplace.com.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Joint Commission clarifies ligature risk requirements
- What to include on the incident report
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- 3 ways CNOs can improve workplace culture
- Code diagnoses and outpatient treatment for PTSD
- Complications from immobility by body system
- E-mailed
-
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q: What are the requirements of an agency's professional advisory committee (PAC)?
- Q/A: Reporting L code and CPT code for splinting
- Q&A: Charging for drug administration during urgent care visit
- Prioritize sepsis assessments in your overcrowded emergency department
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Joint Commission clarifies ligature risk requirements
- Food and drink in patient care areas
- Don't bill 59025, 76818 separately without separate physician orders
- Crossing state lines: What are the rules?
- Searched
