Associate Director's Note: ICD-10 implementation scare tactics continue
CDI Strategies, May 14, 2015
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
We had another ICD-10 scare last week when Rep. Ted Poe (R-Texas) introduced a new bill that could potentially cease ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation. This kind of distraction has come up again and again, and leaves hospitals asking whether or not they really should dedicate the time and money to prepare for ICD-10 implementation.
The short answer is yes, ICD-10 is coming.
We need to let go of the doubts, and prepare as if the implementation date were tomorrow. It’s better to be over-prepared, than not prepared at all.
Members of the ACDIS Advisory Board created the ICD-10 training and implementation timeline for CDI (available on our Helpful Resources page) to help. It includes recommended courses of action and tips and tricks for improving existing documentation practices. It also includes a month-by-month to-do list with training and preparation guidelines to get your team set to go for October 2015. Keep in mind, this timeline begins at the end of 2014. If your facility has not yet started its ICD-10 prep, take a look at the timeline as a whole, use it as a guide, and figure out a reasonable schedule that works for your team.
Additionally, ACDIS Editor Katherine Rushlau recently started a series of ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation tips which publish on the ACDIS Blog every Friday in which she pulls advice from our CDI and coding Boot Camp instructors, Advisory Board members, and current publications to help keep your CDI program progressing in its preparation efforts.
Finally, we encourage you as CDI professionals to remain diligent in staying informed regarding the ongoing debate and to advocate for the advancement of the new code set. The new codes will provide greater specificity, a specificity that could mean improved data analysis and improved health for our nation overall. Who wouldn’t want that?
As Michelle A. Leppert wrote last week on the ICD-10 Trainer Blog, “With less than five months to implementation, we don’t need this kind of distraction. What we need are assurances that another delay won’t happen. Sadly, we probably won’t get the date written in stone and most of us will probably remain skeptical. It’s okay to be a skeptic. Just don’t slow down your ICD-10 implementation work…”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- CMS seeks comment on quality measures
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Don't forget the three checks in medication administration
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Nursing responsibilities for managing pain
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Q&A: Primary, principal, and secondary diagnoses
- ICD-10-CM coma, stroke codes require more specific documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Clearing up the confusion: CPT codes 76376 and 76377
- E-mailed
-
- Coronavirus vaccination: 4 best practices for communicating with patients
- Grievances, Complaints, and Patients’ Rights
- Keyes Q&A: Generator lighting, fire dampers, eyewash stations, ISLM fire drills
- Including 46600 in E/M leveling systems
- How to get reimbursed for restorative nursing
- Fetal non-stress tests represent important part of maternal and fetal health
- Coding, billing, and documentation tips for teaching physicians, interns, residents, and students
- Coding tip: Know how to correctly code each procedure an otolaryngologist can perform on turbinates
- Coding Clinic reiterates guidelines for provider documentation
- CMS creates web portal for questions about 1135 waivers, PHE
- Searched