The week in Medicare updates
APCs Insider, November 15, 2013
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Coordination of Benefits Contractor (COBC) to remove and no longer apply federal tax information on the Common Working File (CWF)
On November 6, CMS issued a change request to inform Medicare contractors that the COBC will remove federal tax information from all employer fields in the Medicare secondary payer (MSP) auxiliary file that was created by contractor number 77777 and 11102 beginning in October 2013. Medicare contractors shall delete all employer information created by CWF contractor number 77777 or 11102 from their internal files if not done so by CWF. All other MSP information housed in the MSP auxiliary record will not be removed.
Effective date: April 1, 2014
Implementation date: April 7, 2014
Reassignment to Part A Critical Access Hospitals (CAH) billing under Method II (CAH II)
On November 7, CMS issued a rescind and replace transmittal to: Explain the purpose of this change request, remove federally qualified health centers and rural health clinics as entities eligible to accept reassignments, and clarify that Part A reassignments only apply to CAHs billing under Method II (CAH II). Also, since all legacy contractors have now transitioned to MACs, the FIs and carriers have been unchecked from the business requirements. All other information remains the same.
Effective date: January 1, 2014
Implementation date: January 7, 2014
View MLN Matters article MM8387.
Modifications to the National Coordination of Benefits Agreement (COBA) Crossover Process
On November 7, CMS issued instructions on how to include new indicators that make it possible to identify various high-volume COBA crossover claims that A/B Medicare Administrative Contractors (MAC) and Durable Medical Equipment MACs created following CMS-directed claims reprocessing actions. An additional scenario that merits a systems change is also addressed in this instruction.
Effective date: April 1, 2014
Implementation date: April 7, 2014
CWF and FISS Informational Unsolicited Response or denial of inpatient services related to a hospice terminal diagnosis
On November 7, CMS issued a transmittal to instruct the Common Working File (CWF) and Fiscal Intermediary Standard System (FISS) maintainers to deny an inpatient hospital claim when the principal diagnosis on the inpatient claim matches one of the hospice diagnosis codes. Services related to a hospice terminal diagnosis provided during a hospice period are included in the hospice payment and are not paid separately. An inpatient hospital claim will be denied when providers bill with a condition code 07 on an inpatient claim and the principal diagnosis on the inpatient claim is found to match one of the hospice diagnosis codes.
Effective date: April 1, 2014
Implementation date: April 7, 2014
View MLN Matters article MM8273.
On November 12, CMS issued a press release announcing the launch of the CMS Virtual Research Data Center at the White House event Data to Knowledge to Action: Building New Partnerships.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
-
Briefings on APCs
Worried about the complexities of the new rules under OPPS and APCs? Briefings on APCs helps you understand the new rules...
-
HIM Briefings
Guiding Health Information Management professionals through the continuously changing field of medical records and toward a...
-
Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies
Submitting improper Medicare documentation can lead to denial of fees, payback, fines, and increased diligence from payers...
-
Briefings on HIPAA
How can you minimize the impact of HIPAA? Subscribe to Briefings on HIPAA, your health information management resource for...
-
APCs Insider
This HTML-based e-mail newsletter provides weekly tips and advice on the new ambulatory payment classifications regulations...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Safety Month showcase: Tips for assessing behavioral health units for ligature risks
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Know guidelines and subtle differences in code descriptions for laceration repairs
- Reimbursement for Facility and Professional Services in a Provider-Based Department by Gina M. Reese, Esq., RN
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- What is the difference between an IPA and a medical group?
- Maryland health system locked out of network by ransomware
- E-mailed
-
- Safety Month showcase: Tips for assessing behavioral health units for ligature risks
- Report revenue code based on setting
- Is it a HIPAA violation for physicians to take patient charts home?
- Infection control violation for storing cardboard boxes
- HIPAA Q&A: Transporting records to satellite clinic
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Correct use of modifier -AY for ESRD
- Condition Code 44
- Coding Clinic for CDI:Reassessing debridement documentation
- Clear up confusion surrounding observation services
- Searched