HIPAA Q&A: HIPAA and electronic signatures
HIM-HIPAA Insider, July 2, 2012
Q: Are digital signatures permissible on custodian affidavit/declaration forms? Signing electronically instead of printing, signing, and scanning would streamline our process. We've never seen electronic signatures on these forms. Are they admissible in court? Some jurisdictions require original signatures, but we're uncertain what California requires. Are the federal e-Sign Act or California's e-Sign law applicable? Our organization has locations in 18 states.
A: Digital signatures on custodian affidavit/declaration forms generally are permissible. They meet the more stringent digital signature requirement eliminated when the HIPAA Security Rule was finalized in 2003. Consult legal counsel to determine whether your state allows use of digital signatures on these forms. Some state laws require that certain documents are signed physically, but this is not a HIPAA requirement.
Electronic and digital signatures differ significantly-legally and technically. Federal law and many state laws allow electronic signatures on some documents. Electronic signatures can be a picture of a signature, an agreed-upon string of characters, a symbol, a signature typed into a signature block in an electronic form, and other personal non-encrypted, agreed-upon identifiers.
A digital signature is an encrypted "hash" or tag that is registered to an individual and accompanies transmission of electronic data or forms signed via computer. They are much more reliable than electronic signatures because they allow recipients to validate senders and prevent repudiation at a later date.
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, Ore. answered this question, which first appeared in the May Briefings on HIPAA. Apgar has more than 17 years of experience in information technology; he specializes in security compliance, assessments, training, and strategic planning. Apgar is a board member of the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange and chair of the Oregon and Southwest Washington Healthcare, Privacy and Security Forum.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Note from Hugh
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- The week in Medicare updates
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Latest scores show incremental progress in hospital safety
- Steps to comply with HIPAA 2.0: Revise your policies and procedures
- Q&A: Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- E-mailed
-
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Q&A: Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- CMS recommends use of AHRQ Common Formats for hospital adverse event reporting
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- 2014 IPPS Proposed Rule: CMS focuses on quality measures, inpatient status
- Changes for Outpatient Laboratory Services Rendered in a Critical Access Hospital (CAH)
- ED physicians key to half of hospital admissions
- Searched
