HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
HIM-HIPAA Insider, June 11, 2012
A. All ePHI, including email, is considered secure if it is secured at a level consistent with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Most NIST documents are not easily decipherable to nontechnical individuals. Several different standards can be used to encrypt data transmitted via email. One common approved standard is the Advanced Encryption Standard (AES). A second, usually used for website encryption and webmail encryption, is Secure Socket Layers (SSL). Encrypting your email with AES or SSL, or another NIST approved standard, is a good place to start.
The next step is determining the strengthof the mathematical algorithm used to protect, or scramble your data. An algorithm less than 128-bit is not secure. The grater the number of bits, the stronger the algorithm is. Many vendors and healthcare entities are transitioning to 256-bit encryption. This exceeds the NIST standard, but is worth considering because it provides better protection to any PHI you transmit via the Internet.
OCR guidance published in an FAQ may be helpful with respect to understanding what is considered “secure” electronic PHI when transmitted via the Internet or email.
Editor's note: Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, Ore. answered this question, which first appeared in the May Briefings on HIPAA. Apgar has more than 17 years of experience in information technology; he specializes in security compliance, assessments, training, and strategic planning. Apgar is a board member of the Workgroup for Electronic Data Interchange and chair of the Oregon and Southwest Washington Healthcare, Privacy and Security Forum.
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Note from Hugh
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- CMS releases updated MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- E-mailed
-
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- CMS recommends use of AHRQ Common Formats for hospital adverse event reporting
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Searched
