Tip: Distinguish traumatic, pathologic fractures in ICD-10-CM
APCs Insider, May 4, 2012
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Coders will need additional details to code fractures with ICD-10-CM. For example, providers must document, in some form, whether a fracture is traumatic or pathologic.
A traumatic fracture is caused by some type of accident, fall, or other kind of force. For example, a traumatic fracture can occur during a motor vehicle accident or when a person is struck with a heavy object.
A pathologic fracture is a broken bone caused by disease. In ICD-9-CM, coders must choose from only eight pathologic fracture codes. ICD-10-CM expands this code selection to more than 150.
So how do coders differentiate the two types of fractures? Sometimes, it's quite obvious. If a patient fractured a leg after falling off a roof while replacing shingles, this is a clear example of a traumatic fracture.
However, an individual who leaned over to retrieve a glass and broke a vertebra likely suffered a pathologic fracture. Leaning over generally does not produce enough force to break a healthy bone.
If a patient suffers a fall or trauma that results in a fracture, don't automatically assume the fracture is traumatic. If the force from a fall or trauma is insufficient to break a healthy bone, the fracture is pathologic.
The tip is adapted from “Fracture coding in ICD-10-CM requires greater specificity” in the May Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Note from Hugh
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Recent Recovery Auditor activity
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- The week in Medicare updates
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Latest scores show incremental progress in hospital safety
- E-mailed
-
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Note from the instructor: CMS clarifies payment amount to be applied to payment caps and manual review thresholds for outpatient therapy services provided by critical access hosptials
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Q&A: Focused professional practice evaluation (FPPE)
- CMS recommends use of AHRQ Common Formats for hospital adverse event reporting
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- Searched
