Q&A: Clarifying ’septic shock’
CDI Strategies, April 12, 2012
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Q: If a physician documents “septic shock” should the CDI specialist query for sepsis to show that both sepsis and septic shock were present, or can you code both conditions from the documentation of septic shock?
A: Sometimes things are easy, sometimes not so much. Physicians use the word “septic shock” for more than infections. For example, they may use the term to describe burns without wounds “sepsis,” and they may use the term for hemorrhagic pancreatitis without abscess. If, indeed, the patient has shock (and the CDI specialist may want to make sure that “shock” really exists) and there is an infection going on that the physician relates to the shock, then the principal diagnosis would be 038.9 followed by the code for the septic shock and 995.92 for severe sepsis plus the code for the infection.
If the physician is using the word “septic shock” for a noninfectious process, then the noninfectious process has to be sequenced first followed by the code for shock and 995.94.
Editor’s Note: This question was answered by Robert S. Gold, MD, CEO of DCBA, Inc., in Atlanta, following the March 29, audio conference “Sepsis Coding: Learn Documentation Improvement Techniques to Ensure Accurate Coding.”
For additional information, read:
- Address these common Q&As related to SIRS documentation
- Revised code definitions, physician education can help differentiate between bacteremia, septicemia coding
- Understand clinical terminology and indications of sepsis
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Practice the six rights of medication administration
- Joint Commission creates new Sentinel Event Alert for violence against healthcare workers
- Joint Commission Urges Hospitals to Protect Workers from Abuse
- Note similarities and differences between HCPCS, CPT® codes
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Don’t forget the three checks in medication administration
- Avoid Eyewash-Related Regulatory Compliance Issues
- CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Complications from immobility by body system
- E-mailed
-
- Joint Commission creates new Sentinel Event Alert for violence against healthcare workers
- Injections and infusions continue to confuse coders
- CMS and Joint Commission clarify door-closing devices standards
- Differentiate between types of wound debridement
- Joint Commission now allows partially-used oxygen canisters in 'full' rack
- Joint Commission Urges Hospitals to Protect Workers from Abuse
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- Report codes 43235, 91035 for gastrointestinal endoscopy
- The Hospital Guide to Contemporary Utilization Review
- Using the JCAHO's six competencies to evaluate MD performance
- Searched