Know how pain justifies medical necessity
HIM Connection, February 7, 2012
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Generally speaking, coders are taught not to code signs and symptoms that are integral to a disease process. However, when patients are admitted for pain control or pain management, the pain should be coded separately and it should be reported as the principal diagnosis.
For example, a patient with metastatic breast cancer presents with intractable neoplasm-related pain. She is admitted and treated with IV pain medication specifically for the pain. In this case, coders must assign a neoplasm-related pain code as the principal diagnosis, says Kathy DeVault, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, manager of professional practice resources at AHIMA in Chicago.
In addition to providing a more accurate clinical picture, reporting acute or chronic pain can help establish medical necessity for certain procedures, says Monica Lenahan, CCS, an AHIMA-certified ICD-10-CM/PCS trainer and coding education and compliance manager at Centura Health in Englewood, CO. She frequently sees denials for spinal cord stimulators when codes for chronic pain, in particular, are absent.
Some MACs require a chronic or acute pain code as a prerequisite for payment. For example, TrailBlazer Health Enterprises, LLC, the MAC for Jurisdiction 4, has a dual diagnosis requirement for implantable pain management devices. Claims must include the reason for the procedure (e.g., the chronic pain) sequenced as the principal diagnosis in addition to a secondary code for the condition that caused the pain, explains Lenahan. Reviewing your MAC's guidelines to ensure compliance in this area is important, she says.
Editor’s note: This tip has been adapted from an article which originally appeared in the February issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- CHANGES COMING: Key differences in nationwide rollout
- Searched