Q&A: Farzad Mostashari on meaningful use, privacy
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, January 16, 2012
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Farzad Mostashari, MD, ScM, national coordinator for health information technology at the Department of Health and Human Services spoke about the challenges his office faces, the importance of patients being involved in their care, and how his office is working to protect patient medical records with HealthLeaders Media (HLM).
HLM: What are three toughest challenges you plan to tackle in 2012?
Mostashari: Adoption of meaningful use, information exchange and interoperability, and maintaining privacy and security. We want 2012 to be a huge year for meaningful use. I think doctors, hospitals, and vendors are geared up. It will be an enormous year for providers who qualify for the incentive, but more importantly to start to establish the information foundation for delivering care that is inconceivably better in all ways—higher quality, safer, more patient-centered, and more coordinated. It is fantastic to have the records in an electronic format in the doctor’s offices and to have those records used to take better care not just of individual patients, but of the entire population of patients.
It is just as important that those records be shared across the different settings when the patient moves from outpatient to inpatient care, then back home or to a long-term care facility, and back to the primary care doctor’s office and then to a specialist. We’re really pushing in a major way on information exchange and interoperability. Of course, what has to be paramount for everybody is the shared responsibility of maintaining the privacy and security of those patient records.
Read the rest of this story on HIPAA Update blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched