Final rule updating MLR to factor in ICD-10 conversion costs
HIM Connection, December 23, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
CMS released a final rule to address the medical loss ratio (MLR) by including provisions for ICD-10-CM/PCS conversion cost considerations. This is intended to alleviate financial concerns associated with the costly implementation of the HIPAA 5010 transaction standard as well as ICD-10-CM/PCS, which both require significant changes to software and database systems as well as extensive training for the new code sets.
MLR is the ratio of total losses paid in insurance claims divided by the total earned premiums collected by insurers. Regulations of MLR mandate that insurers may only spend 15–20%of revenue from premiums on non-clinical expenses (e.g., administrative costs) to reduce excessive spending.
The provisions in this final rule allow insurers to shift some of the ICD-10-CM/PCS conversion costs to the category of clinical cost, which will be considered as a quality improvement activity. This will allow insurers to count up to 0.3%of earned premiums in the relevant state market as quality improvement activity.
This specification of how the MLR is calculated will help covered entities address some of the costs of ICD-10-CM/PCS implementation. CMS still considers costs associated with ICD-10-CM/PCS maintenance and the claims adjudication system to be administrative. These costs will fall under the MLR restriction on non-clinical spending limits.
This final rule will be effective on January 1, 2012, and will be open for public comment until January 6, 2012.
This article originally appeared on JustCoding. View the complete final rule on the Federal Register website.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
