Tip: Know when limits on liability apply
APCs Weekly Monitor, December 23, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
A facility must provide patients an ABN when limits on liability (LOL) apply. LOL specifically applies when a facility believes the service does not meet Medicare's definition of medically necessary for a particular patient's condition. However, the services might be medically necessary for other patients with other conditions.
LOL also applies when a facility believes Medicare will deny a service because the patient is undergoing a screening service outside the normal frequency parameters. For example, Medicare will pay for an annual screening mammogram for women over age 40. This means that if a physician orders a screening mammogram twice annually for a 45-year-old woman, Medicare will likely not pay for the service.
A lack of medical necessity occurs when diagnosis codes on an outpatient order fail to support the CPT® codes that describe the services ordered.
One of the biggest challenges in implementing an effective ABN process is identifying Medicare's medical necessity guidelines. Generally, the guidelines are based on coverage criteria included in various CMS manuals, national coverage determinations (NCD), and local coverage determinations (LCD). NCDs apply to every facility nationwide, but LCDs are specific to local FIs/MACs. LCDs can vary among FIs/MACs as well
The tip is adapted from “Unscramble the complexities of ABNs” in the December issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Modifier -59 Case Studies: Clarify Common Coding Confusion
Modifier -59 is a perennial problem area for outpatient coders. It shouldn’t be viewed as a way to guarantee payment but...
-
Outpatient Bed Charge Capture: Billing for Common and Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference, our expert speakers walk you through common and complex cases and explain compliant...
-
Billing No-Cost and Low-Cost Devices: Tips to Avoid the Audit Fast Track
During this 90-minute audio conference, our speakers will use a case study to demonstrate best practices to help you comply...
-
Spinal ICD-9 and CPT Coding
During this two-hour audio conference, our speakers will discuss common coding errors for spinal diagnoses and procedures...
-
2012 OPPS Final Rule: Analyze the Impact and Manage the Changes
Expert speakers Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, return for this popular program. They review the final rule...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched