News: Trailblazer to begin prepayment reviews for four cardiac-related procedures
CDI Strategies, December 22, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Effective December 15, Trailblazer Health Enterprises, LLC, began prepay service-specific medical reviews of the following DRGs:
- DRG 227 (cardiac defibrillator implant without cardiac catheterization without major complications and comorbidities)
- DRG 251 (percutaneous cardiovascular procedure without coronary artery stent without major complications and comorbidities)
- DRG 253 (other vascular procedures with complications and comorbidities)
- DRG 254 (other vascular procedures without complications and comorbidities/major complications and comorbidities)
TrailBlazer is the Medicare Administrative Contractor (MAC) covering Part A and Part B payments for Colorado, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Texas, and the Indian Health Service. It encourages providers to “analyze internal data for compliance with coverage and coding guidelines and medical necessity requirements in accordance with Medicare policy.”
Furthermore, TrailBlazer recently announced that it will be comparing Part A (hospital) with Part B (physician) claims, looking for discrepancies between the two (read more about this in the upcoming January edition of The CDI Journal). The notice, Part A/B Cross-Claim Medical Review: The Impact It Will Have on Physicians, is located on the Trailblazer website.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
