Q&A: Reporting discontinued radiology procedures
APCs Weekly Monitor, December 9, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: Our radiologist attempted to perform a barium enema with air contrast. However, the radiologist could not complete the examination because because the patient became incontinent of barium after several attempts to fill the colon with barium. The radiologist documented “limited evaluation of the colon” and the results of the films. Would reporting this exam with modifier -74 (discontinued outpatient procedure after anesthesia administration) be appropriate? If not, how should we report this exam?
A: Modifier -74 is not be the correct modifier because anesthesia was not administered. Modifiers -73 (discontinued outpatient procedure prior to anesthesia administration) and -74 are generally the most appropriate modifiers for discontinued surgical type procedures. The CMS Claims Processing Manual , Chapter 4, §20.6.6, addresses radiology modifiers and reporting discontinued procedures:
When a radiology procedure is reduced, the correct reporting is to code to the extent of the procedure performed. If no HCPCS code exists for the service that has been completed, report the intended HCPCS code with modifier -52 [reduced services] appended.
Based on the documentation provided, it is unclear whether any HCPCS code describes the extent of the exam performed. You should review the report of the procedure in detail and determine whether any code describes the portion of the procedure that was performed or whether you should report the code for the intended procedure with modifier -52.
Editor’s note: Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, director of revenue integrity services at Health Revenue Assurance Associates, Inc., in Plantation, FL, answered this question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
