Tip: Differentiate between packaged, bundled services
APCs Weekly Monitor, November 11, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Packaging is different from bundling—bundling is a coding concept, whereas packaging is a payment concept.
With bundling, coders only report the most comprehensive code and don't report the subsequent code(s) on separate lines of the bill.
NCCI edits specify which codes are bundled codes, and under normal circumstances, coders should not separately report codes for these services. The charges for these services should be reported as part of the charge for the bundled code, or they may appear separately on an appropriate revenue code line without a HCPCS code.
Packaging is very different. Hospitals generally report the packaged services, but do not receive a separate payment for these services because they receive payment as part of other separately paid services reported on the same claim. For example, although recovery services are billed separately on a claim, CMS packages them into the payment for surgery.
To illustrate an example of packaging, payment for a surgical CPT ® code includes:
- Surgical time and supplies
- Covered drugs
- Implantable devices
- Recovery time
- Observation time
Unlike bundled items and services, packaged items and services may—and sometimes must—be reported separately on the claim with a HCPCS code. Packaged services generally have status indicator N, but they may also have status indicators Q1 or Q2. Items or services separately payable under OPPS have status indicators G, H, K, P, Q3, R, S, T, U, V, or X.
The tip is adapted from “Correctly count observation time for outpatients” in the August Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
