Tip: Monitor diagnoses targeted for readmission reduction
CDI Strategies, November 10, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Coders and CDI specialists need to understand the implications coding and sequencing may have on readmissions data and cohort selection, says James S. Kennedy, MD, CCS, managing director at FTI Consulting in Atlanta and a member of the ACDIS advisory board.
Kennedy’s admonition comes as CMS moves to reduce excessive readmissions for acute myocardial infarction, heart failure, and/or pneumonia, conditions related to the Hospital Readmissions Reduction Program required by the Affordable Care Act and outlined in the fiscal year 2012 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Final Rule.
"Recognizing that this data will start being collected on October 1, 2011, the sooner the coding [and CDI] department[s] work with the quality department on this issue, the better," Kennedy says.
For example, if coders report documented septicemia or acute respiratory failure as the principal diagnosis when a patient is admitted for pneumonia-and a readmission occurs within 30 days, CMS will not count the second admission as a readmission, says Kennedy. Similarly, certain heart failure patients won't be included depending on how conditions are sequenced. For example, a patient admitted with heart failure also has symptoms and an acute troponin rise indicative of acute myocardial infarction or clinical circumstances supporting acute respiratory failure at the time of admission. If acute myocardial infarction or acute respiratory failure is sequenced as principal and the patient is readmitted within 30 days, CMS won't consider the second admission to be a heart failure readmission.
Visit the QualityNet website at http://tinyurl.com/b5zrph for more information.
Editor’s Note: For more advice, access the article in its entirety in the November issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
