Carefully examine syncope and collapse denials
HIM Connection, October 18, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Hospitals reported syncope and collapse (MS-DRG 312) as the top MS-DRG with respect to financial impact due to denials for lack of medical necessity and incorrect coding, according to AHA RACTrac data released in May.
Medical necessity denials for MS-DRG 312 are likely the more frequent culprit, but incorrect coding and sequencing also poses a challenge, says Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, C-CDI, CCDS, an independent HIM consultant in Madison, WI. For example, when a physician determines after study that the patient's syncope is related to pneumonia, coders should report pneumonia as the principal diagnosis. Coders should not separately report syncope because it is a symptom that can be associated with pneumonia, according to ICD-9-CM guidelines. This yields MS-DRG 195 (simple pneumonia and pleurisy without CC/MCC) with a relative weight of 0.7096 for FY 2011.
Some coders incorrectly report syncope as the principal diagnosis with pneumonia as a secondary condition, yielding MS-DRG 312, which has a relative weight for FY 2011 of 0.7172.
Review coding guidelines for MS-DRG 312 and how they pertain to signs and symptoms, assignment of principal diagnosis, and sequencing, advises Krauss.
Editor’s note: For more advice, access the article in its entirety in the October issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
