Remote coding: The good, the bad, and the productivity
HIM Connection, September 6, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
According to a survey on coder productivity published in the May edition of MRB, 83% of those with remote coding programs reported that coder productivity either remained the same or increased after they implemented a remote coding program at their facility. That's great news for those considering establishing a remote coding program. And there are many reasons to do so, both for your coding staff and for your hospital.
"The coders who work from home, they truly become much happier," said Deborah C. Beezley, RHIT, director of HIM at St. Anthony's Medical Center in St. Louis, who spoke during the June 27 HCPro audio conference, "Coder Productivity in Today's Environment: Strategies to Combat Challenges and Improve Efficiencies."
"We've seen a turn in behaviors," she said. "They are more amenable to change and transition."
Remote coding also allows for additional flexibility, not only in work hours (e.g., day, evening, or night shift), but also in terms of offering coders overtime when it is needed, said Beezley. "We've seen the coders want to help with extra support hours," she said. This allows the hospital to cover peak periods and balance out the accounts receivable. In addition, the coders are willing to come on-site to help out when necessary. St. Anthony's has a hybrid record, and occasionally paper needs to be handled. "If that gets backlogged a little bit, we've had coders volunteer to come in and deal with paper sometimes to catch us up."
Editor’s note: Click here to read the entire article in the September issue of Medical Records Briefing.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
