News: TrailBlazer probe highlights documentation disparity
CDI Strategies, September 2, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Out of 88 claims for MS-DRG 246 (percutaneous cardiovascular procedure with drug-eluting stent with MCC or 4+ vessels/stents with a length of stay less than or equal to two days) reviewed during a recent probe audit, TrailBlazer Health Enterprises, LCC, fully denied 65 of them, according to a recent notice released by the Medicare Administrative Contractor (Notice ID 14504).
TrailBlazer, the J4 Medicare Administrative Contractor for Texas, Oklahoma, Colorado, and New Mexico, conducted the probe after it identified DRG 246, “as a service that receives significant reimbursement from Medicare.”
“As you take a few minutes to read the [notice], you will see several references to clinical documentation including lack of documentation reflecting complication or severity of illness warranting inpatient admission,” says Glenn Krauss, BBA, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPUR, FCS, PCS, CCDS, C-CDI, an independent consultant based in Madison, WI.
According to the probe results, medical records reviewed did not include laboratory and diagnostic test results or physician interpretation of diagnostic tests. Furthermore the results indicate that documentation was lacking for complication or severity of illness, risk factors, or complications that could only be treated at an inpatient level of care.
“With this in mind, there certainly is ample opportunity for our profession to expand our thoughts and efforts to ‘holistically’ improve clinical documentation,” says Krauss.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify modifiable risk factors to prevent patient falls
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- Searched
