News: Palmetto issues warning about documentation error rates
CDI Strategies, August 4, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Healthcare providers in the A/B MAC jurisdiction 1 have a problem—a paid claims error rate that’s nearly twice the national average for Part B claims, according to a recent letter from that region’s MAC coordinator Palmetto GBA. By far the primary reason for those errors, says Palmetto (which covers California, Nevada, Hawaii, Guam, and the Northern Mariana Islands), is the lack of adequate documentation to support the billed services.
“An error rate of this magnitude can quickly evolve into a negative perception of the quality of care provided to Medicare beneficiaries,” the letter states.
Palmetto’s strongly-worded communication states that the MAC will be taking an “aggressive approach designed to address the causes of documentation errors” including increasing the number of prepayment and post-payment record reviews “across all provider types and services.”
Palmetto indicated that insufficient documentation errors occur when:
- A provider fails to respond to repeated attempts to obtain medical records
- Medical documents submitted do not contain pertinent patient facts (patient’s condition, diagnosis etc.)
- Medical documentation is illegible, has no date, is improperly signed, etc.
“You control the documentation describing what services your patients received, and your documentation serves as the basis for the bills sent to Medicare for the services you provided,” the letter states. “If your documentation does not support the services on the claim, then a payment error exists.”
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Hospitals are not bound by InterQual criteria for determining patient status
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched