Q/A: Charging for PICC line insertion radiologic guidance
APCs Weekly Monitor, July 15, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: We have been told that we may not charge for radiology chest one view or two views (CPT® codes 71010, 71020) when performed with the percutaneous insertion of a central catheter (PICC) placements. We created this radiology charge to ensure correct placement and position of the catheter. Our hospitals can perform up to 15 chest x-rays daily for outpatient PICC placements. How can we capture and charge for these resources?
A: The most current information available from the National Correct Coding Initiative Coding Policy Manual for Medicare Services states:
When a central venous catheter is inserted, a chest radiologic examination is usually performed to confirm the position of the catheter and absence of pneumothorax. The chest radiologic examination is integral to the procedure, and a chest radiologic examination (e.g., CPT codes 71010, 71020) should not be reported separately.
Based on this instruction, review the following CPT codes:
- Central venous catheter insertion (36555–36571, 36578–36585)
- Fluoroscopic guidance (77001)
Regardless of whether fluoroscopy is performed during PICC line insertion, you may not charge for the initial chest imaging film that ensures correct placement as a separate line item with modifier -59 (distinct procedural service). This is a screening exam for placement and is not diagnostic.
Hospitals should build the cost of the imaging into the overall charge for the procedure to ensure they capture the use of resources and are submitting appropriate charges for future APC rate setting.
Editor’s note: Andrea Clark, RHIA, CCS, CPCH, president of Health Revenue Assurance Associates, Inc., in Plantation, FL, answered this question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Modifier -59 Case Studies: Clarify Common Coding Confusion
Modifier -59 is a perennial problem area for outpatient coders. It shouldn’t be viewed as a way to guarantee payment but...
-
Outpatient Bed Charge Capture: Billing for Common and Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference, our expert speakers walk you through common and complex cases and explain compliant...
-
Billing No-Cost and Low-Cost Devices: Tips to Avoid the Audit Fast Track
During this 90-minute audio conference, our speakers will use a case study to demonstrate best practices to help you comply...
-
Spinal ICD-9 and CPT Coding
During this two-hour audio conference, our speakers will discuss common coding errors for spinal diagnoses and procedures...
-
2012 OPPS Final Rule: Analyze the Impact and Manage the Changes
Expert speakers Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, return for this popular program. They review the final rule...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched