Q&A: Coding conflicting documentation
HIM Connection, July 12, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q: Many of our orthopedic surgeons are documenting open reduction internal fixation (ORIF); however, when we read the body of the operative report, it’s clear that they actually performed a closed reduction before opening the patient. In some instances, they didn’t perform a reduction at all. We have started to query the surgeons about this issue and wondered how other facilities are handling this.
A: Coders should always read operative reports fully and then code according to the specific physician documentation found in the report. The ICD-9-CM index specifies the following:
Reduction
Fracture (closed) 79.00
With internal fixation 79.10
Keep the following other points in mind:
- If the surgeon reduces the fracture prior to incision and internal fixation, this is considered a closed fracture reduction with internal fixation. Report ICD-9-CM procedure code 79.10.
- Open fracture reductions are those that surgeons perform after making an incision into the fracture site. Report ICD-9-CM procedure code 79.30 when the physician also performs internal fixation.
- Coders should pay attention to the Multiple Coding Clinic references regarding closed reductions with internal fixations. These include Coding Clinic, First Quarter 1993, p. 27; Coding Clinic, Fourth Quarter 1993, p. 35; and Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 1994, p. 6. In addition, see Coding Clinic, Second Quarter 1993, p. 3, for additional guidelines regarding types of fracture treatment.
- If the surgeon performs internal fixation without any fracture reduction, report ICD-9-CM procedure code 78.5x. The ICD-9-CM index specifies the following:
Fixation
Bone
Internal (without fracture reduction) 78.50
With fracture reduction—see Reduction, fracture
Editor’s note: Jean Stone, RHIT, CCS, coding manager at Lucile Packard Children’s Hospital at Stanford in Palo Alto, CA, answered this question in the July issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
