Tip: Ask these questions before appending modifier -59
APCs Weekly Monitor, July 8, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Coders can use a decision tree to ensure they append modifier -59 (distinct procedural service) appropriately.
First, are the codes bundled together based on CPT® or NCCI guidelines? Check the NCCI edits carefully using computer software, the Medicare website, or Medicare manuals. If the codes bundle together, report both without an unbundling modifier. If they do not, proceed to the next question.
Second, is the procedure distinct from other procedures (e.g., different site, session, patient, diagnosis)? If not, bill only the primary service and not the bundled code. If yes, proceed to the next question.
Third, does the NCCI edit have a 0 modifier indicator? This indicator means that you may never bypass the edit regardless of which modifier you append. If the edit has a 0 indicator, do not use modifier -59 and do not bill separately. If it doesn't have a 0 indicator, proceed to the next question.
Finally, can you append a better, more specific modifier than modifier -59? Examples include those that specify side of the body, (i.e., -LT,–RT) and the digit modifiers (e.g., -T1, -T2). If you can append a more specific modifier, use it to bill separately; if not, append modifier -59 to bill separately.
The tip is adapted from “Decision tree helps guide appropriate use of modifier -59” in the June issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
