Q/A: Reporting multiple outpatient visits that occur the same day
APCs Weekly Monitor, June 17, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: Some of our outpatient claims contain multiple charges reported with revenue code 0761 (treatment room) and multiple facility E/M codes for the same date of service. Is this correct?
A: You may report multiple medical visits and services on the same date of service, but the provider must exhibit due diligence.
Review these charge line-items against the medical record documentation and each department’s E/M mapping criteria to ensure accuracy and reliability e. Then review the Medicare Claims Processing Manual, Chapter 4, §180.4 – Proper Reporting of Condition Code G0 is your next step.
Hospitals subject to Outpatient Prospective Payment System (OPPS) report Condition Code G0 on FLs 24-30 (or the corresponding electronic location) when multiple medical visits occurred on the same day in the same revenue center (0450, 0761, 0510) but the visits were distinct and constituted independent visits. An example of such a situation would be a beneficiary going to the emergency room twice on the same day, in the morning for a broken arm and later for chest pain.
Multiple medical visits on the same day in the same revenue center may be submitted on separate claims. Hospitals should report condition code G0 on the second claim. Appropriate reporting of Condition Code G0 allows for accurate payment under OPPS in this situation. The OCE contains an edit that will reject multiple medical visits on the same day with the same revenue code without the presence of Condition Code G0.
Editor’s note: Denise Williams, RN, CPC-H, director of revenue integrity services at Health Revenue Assurance Associates, Inc., in Plantation, FL, answered this question.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- News and briefs: Oklahoma Osteopathic Association against residency bill change
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
