Q&A: Surgery schedule posting vs. HIPAA privacy
HIM Connection, June 14, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q: Posting the surgery schedule has been a recent topic of discussion at our hospital. Who should receive a copy of the surgery schedule? Does posting the schedule at nurses' stations as a reference for unit clerks violate HIPAA? Our business office also receives this information, which it requests for workers' compensation issues.
A: The minimum necessary standard should govern distribution of the surgery schedule. Specifically, the schedule should be available only to those who need it to perform their jobs, and those staff members should receive only the information they actually need.
Review the current distribution list to determine which individuals or departments receive copies of the schedule. Then contact all of them and ask why they need the information, what they do with it, and the what the minimum amount of information is that they need. You may find that many recipients are receiving the list because they like to know who's having surgery, but don't have a legitimate business need for the information.
Consider creating two versions of the surgery schedule. One version could be the full schedule, including the specific surgical procedures being performed. Surgery staff may need this version for scheduling and room setup. Nursing administration may need it to determine staffing ratios.
The second version could omit the specific surgical procedures. Staff could use this version in the surgery waiting room to help answer family members' questions and to direct surgeons to the appropriate families for postoperative updates.
Unit clerks and the business office are unlikely to need a copy of the full surgery schedule. Posting the full schedule at nursing stations for anyone to view is unacceptable.
Editor’s note: Mary D. Brandt, MBA, RHIA, CHE, CHPS, nationally recognized expert on patient privacy, information security, and regulatory compliance, answered this question in the June issue of Briefings on HIPAA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
