Tip: Spread the word about physician legibility
CDI Strategies, April 14, 2011
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Legible. Complete. Dated, timed, signed, and authenticated. That's what section 482.24 of the Medicare Conditions of Participation requires of medical records. But many facilities struggle to achieve this seemingly simple task. Falling short doesn't just affect quality and patient care. Auditors can deny claims when orders are missing signatures or documentation is illegible.
Consider that, per the March 10, 2010, CMS Transmittal 327, "If the signature is missing from an order, [auditors] shall disregard the order during the review of the claim."
- Spread the word through a physician newsletter. Reisinger submitted examples to the hospital's physician/clinician newsletter regarding legibility. The newsletter was well received, says Reisinger.
- Get your chief medical officer (CMO) involved. Reisinger worked with her CMO to discuss the issue and brainstorm solutions during her hospital's medical executive committee meetings. For example, they're currently discussing whether to give physicians rubber stamps with their names to clarify signatures, or asking (though not yet insisting) that physicians print their name underneath their signatures.
- Take a one-on-one approach. Reisinger says having one-on-one conversations with physicians can be especially helpful if you use specific examples. It may not be possible to meet individually with all clinicians at larger facilities and organizations, but because Community Medical Center is a smaller hospital, she is able to have the discussions and has seen how helpful they can be.
Editor’s Note: This article is an excerpt from the April edition of Medical Records Briefing.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
