Tip: Get your documentation 'RAC ready'
APCs Weekly Monitor, December 31, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
If you aren’t preparing for the RACs now, you should be. Although much attention is being given to their focus on diagnosis-related groups (DRG) validation and other inpatient audits, outpatient facilities and physician practices should not overlook the importance of RAC preparation.
Physician offices and outpatient facilities should begin reviewing documentation to ensure it will pass muster once RAC requests start arriving. Often, documentation fails to meet Medicare guidelines.
Physicians and facilities sometimes overlook even the basics, so be certain that you and your physicians know:
- What documentation constitutes a complete history
- Which exam elements are required for a comprehensive exam
- What CMS means by “medical necessity”
RACs already are reviewing medical necessity in the hospital setting. They also are comparing what a hospital reports on a claim with what physicians report. RACs are reviewing everything from ICD-9-CM coding to date of discharge—and they are looking for those claims to match.
This tip was adapted from “RAC audits are not just an inpatient issue” in the December issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
