Keep tabs on digital cameras
HIM Connection, December 28, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
You worry about laptop computers and other portable devices being stolen. But what about digital cameras?
A stolen digital camera that contained photographs and newborn babies’ personal information resulted in a privacy breach at the University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences (UAMS) in Little Rock. On October 12, someone stole the camera from the pocket of a nurse’s lab coat, according to a posting on the UAMS website.
Many people would not think of a digital camera as a security risk, says Chris Apgar, CISSP, president of Apgar & Associates, LLC, in Portland, OR. “Many healthcare organizations do not take into account all of the places PHI is stored such as on a digital camera, copy machines, fax machines, biomedical equipment, and so forth, and [do not] recognize it as a security risk.”
UAMS is reminding staff about the need to secure items such as cameras. It is also reminding staff about the need to delete images from cameras after downloading them to a secure computer.
As soon as a photo is taken, staff should store it in a hospital’s electronic health record or some other managed system and remove it from the camera, says Christopher Hourihan, manager of common security framework development and operations at HITRUST, the Health Information Trust Alliance in Frisco, TX.
UAMS is also reviewing all of its policies and procedures involving photographs of patients to ensure that it is doing everything it can to prevent such an incident from occurring again.
Editor’s note: To read more, subscribe to HCPro’s Briefings on HIPAA. Subscribers can find the article in the December issue of their newsletters.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
