Q&A: Releasing records to an insurance company
HIM-HIPAA Insider, December 7, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM-HIPAA Insider!
Q. An insurance company is requesting copies of medical records to review our CPT® coding. These cases are at least one year old and have been paid already. The insurance company said its review will not affect our payment. Do we need patient authorization to release these records, since this does not involve treatment, payment, or office operations?
A. Covered entities (CE) are permitted to use or disclose PHI without patient authorization for treatment, payment, and healthcare operations. Most CEs think about their own healthcare operations, but the Privacy Rule permits CEs to release PHI to another CE—if the second CE needs the information for its healthcare operations—as long as both CEs have a relationship with the patient.
In this case, you may release patient records to the insurance company if it is auditing the accuracy of its claims payment process. This request is probably legitimate; you’ll simply need to get more information from the insurance company to ensure that this is part of its healthcare operations.
Editor’s note: Mary D. Brandt, MBA, RHIA, CHE, CHPS, associate executive director of Health Information Management (HIM) at Scott & White Healthcare in Temple, TX answered this question, which originally appeared in the December issue of Briefings on HIPAA.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM-HIPAA Insider!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Note from Hugh
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Five tips for an effective hospital patient safety program
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- CMS releases updated MDS 3.0 RAI User's Manual
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- E-mailed
-
- Questions surround when time starts for proposed inpatient presumption
- Jury sides with blood lab technician in New Jersey whistleblower case
- Q/A: Should we use modifier -Q0 to override edits for ICDs?
- Overnight physicians in ICU show little effect on outcomes
- Tip: Review codes that are now packaged
- QAPI is coming: Is your facility preparing for its arrival?
- ACDIS/AHIMA brief provides guidance on query best practices
- Maine comes in first in hospital safety
- Surgical residents disapprove of duty hour restrictions
- Tip: Nursing documentation requirements for observation services
- Searched
