Study: HITECH will not improve patient privacy
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, November 15, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
The HITECH Act has been under recent scrutiny for not improving the safety of patient records, according to research from The Ponemon Institute.
For 65 hospitals mostly in the 100- to 600-bed range, 71% of respondents say they have inadequate resources to prevent and quickly detect patient data loss. The same percentage of respondents say federal regulations like HITECH have not improved the safety of patient records, research from the “Benchmark Study on Patient Privacy and Data Security” conveys.
Rick Kam, founder of study sponsor, ID Experts, says he often hears that hospital leaders do not provide the necessary resources and do not make protecting patients’ privacy a priority. “We need to do a better job,” Kam adds, “this is a call to action.”
Study findings include the following:
- The majority of responding organizations have less than two staff members dedicated to data protection management (67%)
- Hospitals say that protecting patient data is not a top priority (70%)
- Patient billing information and medical records are most at risk because they are not being protected
- Patients are typically first to detect a significant number of breaches at healthcare organizations (41%)
Read the full story on HIPAA Update blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched