Q&A: Assigning the correct DRG when a caregiver refuses a vaccination
HIM Connection, November 9, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q: I heard that code V64.05 (vaccination not carried out because of caregiver refusal) has been removed from MS-DRG 794 (neonate with other significant problems) and instead moved to MS-DRG 795 (normal newborn). Could you provide more information about this?
A: Coders current report code V64.05 when a physician documents that a caregiver or parent has refused immunization for a child. Coding Clinic, 1st quarter 2007, reiterates that the code should be assigned when immunization is not administered because of parental refusal.
Prior to October 1, reporting this code as a principal or secondary diagnosis yielded MS-DRG 794 for an otherwise normal newborn. However, in the fiscal year 2011 IPPS final rule, CMS states that the presence of code V64.05 does not indicate a significant problem with the newborn and should not be assigned to MS-DRG 794. Therefore, it has moved the code to the secondary diagnosis list for MS-DRG 795.
Editor’s note: Shannon E. McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I,CEMC, CCDS, director of HIM and coding for HCPro, Inc answered this question, which originally appeared in the November issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
