Tip: Differentiate between modifiers -58 and -78
APCs Weekly Monitor, October 29, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Coders may struggle to determine when to use modifier -58 (staged or related procedure or service by the same physician during the postoperative period) or modifier -78 (return to the OR for related procedure during the postoperative period [same day]).
In some situations, a physician may plan or stage second procedures for a patient that falls within the original procedure’s global period. For example, a physician performs a debridement of a patient’s burn. The physician knows he or she will need to perform additional debridements and documents this in the patient’s chart. When the physician performs the additional debridement, append modifier -58.
The physician may also need to perform a more extensive procedure than the original one. For example, a physician performs a breast biopsy and diagnoses the patient with breast cancer. One week later, the same physician performs a modified radical mastectomy on the right breast. In this case, append modifier -58 to the code for the modified radical mastectomy.
Append modifier -58 for the following:
- Procedures that are planned or anticipated (staged)
- Therapy following a surgical procedure
- Procedures that are more extensive than the original procedure
You can use modifier -58 even when the physician did not plan the staged or related procedure, if it is more extensive than the original procedure.
Do not use modifier -58 if the physician returns the patient to the OR because of unplanned complications to a procedure. For example, a surgeon removes polyps from a patient’s colon. Several hours later, the physician returns the patient to the OR and performs a colonoscopy with electrocautery to control postoperative bleeding. In this case, append modifier -78.
This tip was adapted from “Messy modifiers: -25, -52, -58, -78, and -59 explained” in the October issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
