News: MLN Matters article SE1028 rewrites rules of reporting secondary diagnoses
CDI Strategies, October 14, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
A recent MLN Matters article has changed the official coding guidelines to define what documentation can be used for assigning secondary diagnoses, leaving some CDI specialists worried that it provides RACs with the ability to invalidate any diagnoses not specifically documented by the attending physician.
However, the good news is that the article has been brought to the attention of CMS and a corrected MLN Matters article may be forthcoming. ACDIS will monitor the situation.
MLN Matters article SE1028 (Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC) Demonstration High-Risk Diagnosis Related Group (DRG) Coding Vulnerabilities for Inpatient Hospitals) states that:
“All inpatient admissions must have all ‘other’ or ‘secondary’ diagnoses identified by the attending physician. Other or secondary diagnoses are additional conditions that affect patient care.”
However, this guidance directly contradicts Coding Clinic, which states that documentation can be taken from other providers participating in the care of the patient and does not have to be documented (or confirmed) by the attending physician. From Coding Clinic, First Quarter 2004:
“Medical record documentation from any physician involved in the care and treatment of the patient, including documentation by consulting physicians, is appropriate for the basis of code assignment…(if) there is no conflicting documentation from another physician (including the attending physician)”.
As of now SE1028 is still posted on the CMS Web site. You can read it here: http://www.cms.gov/MLNMattersArticles/downloads/SE1028.pdf.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
