Feds indict five in Johns Hopkins ID theft
HIPAA Weekly Advisor, October 11, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
A federal grand jury in Maryland indicted five Baltimore-area residents on fraud and aggravated identity theft charges in a scheme to use patient personal information stolen from Johns Hopkins Hospital to open credit card accounts and make more than $600,000 in “instant credit” buys at retail stores.
The grand jury indicted Michael Allen, age 34; Jasmine Amber Smith, 25; Tyrell Douglas McCormick, 22; Ayanna Devon Johnson, 38; and Gloria Canada, 54. The superseding indictment was returned on September 15 and unsealed with the arrest of Canada, the final defendant.
Officials at Johns Hopkins Medicine said they do not comment on ongoing litigation and referred all inquires to the U.S. Attorneys Office in Baltimore.
According to the 39-count indictment, while employed by Johns Hopkins Hospital from August 2007 to March 2009, Smith improperly obtained the personal identity information of patients and the parents and guardians of minor patients, including names, Social Security numbers, birthdates, and addresses. Smith gave the stolen information to Johnson and Canada, according to the indictment.
From May 2008 to June 2009, Allen and McCormick used the stolen information to apply for instant credit at stores make purchases before the victims received the fraudulently obtained credit cards, according to the indictment. The indictment says that the defendants fraudulently obtained more than $600,000 in credit from more than 50 stores and individuals.
The defendants each face a maximum sentence of 30 years in prison for conspiracy to commit bank fraud and two years in prison consecutive to any other sentence for aggravated identity theft. McCormick and Allen face up to an addition 30 years in prison for bank fraud and 15 years in prison for access device fraud.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIPAA Weekly Advisor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched