Tip: Differentiate between new, established patients when selecting E/M level
APCs Weekly Monitor, September 10, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Designating a patient as new or established depends on whether the patient has been registered as an inpatient or outpatient of the hospital or clinic within the past three years.
An established patient is one who has been registered as an inpatient or outpatient of the hospital within the three years prior to the visit.
A new patient is one who has not been registered as an inpatient or outpatient of the hospital within the three years prior to the visit.
Patients registered as outpatients in a hospital’s off-campus provider-based clinic or ED within the past three years would be considered established patients of the hospital for on-campus or off-campus clinic visits, even if the hospital created their medical records more than three years ago.
As with previous policy, a patient may be new to a physician but established with respect to the hospital. The opposite would be true if the physician has a longstanding relationship with the patient, in which case the patient would be an established patient with respect to the physician and a new patient with respect to the hospital.
This tip is adapted from “Use internal guidelines to ensure consistent E/M coding” in the August issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Modifier -59 Case Studies: Clarify Common Coding Confusion
Modifier -59 is a perennial problem area for outpatient coders. It shouldn’t be viewed as a way to guarantee payment but...
-
Outpatient Bed Charge Capture: Billing for Common and Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference, our expert speakers walk you through common and complex cases and explain compliant...
-
Billing No-Cost and Low-Cost Devices: Tips to Avoid the Audit Fast Track
During this 90-minute audio conference, our speakers will use a case study to demonstrate best practices to help you comply...
-
Spinal ICD-9 and CPT Coding
During this two-hour audio conference, our speakers will discuss common coding errors for spinal diagnoses and procedures...
-
2012 OPPS Final Rule: Analyze the Impact and Manage the Changes
Expert speakers Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, return for this popular program. They review the final rule...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched