Q&A: Facility policies should dictate whether queries are part of the medical record
CDI Strategies, September 2, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Q: If a CDI specialist or coder queries a physician and the response is written on the query letter is it legal to code from this? Or should the physician only respond in his or her progress note or discharge summary? Also, can the facility make the query letter part of the medical chart?
A: The answer is, as with many situations, it depends. If the form that the coder uses has been approved as permanent part of the medical record, then the physician may reply on this form and the answer can be coded.
The term “legal” implies something governed by state or federal law. To the best of my knowledge, legal precedent has not been established addressing the use of physician query forms. Whether queries (either concurrent, retrospective, or both) are considered a permanent part of the record is a decision determined by individual facilities—generally after consulting the compliance officer and legal counsel.
- contain compliant, non-leading language,
- include patient-specific clinical indicators
- provide clinically appropriate choices
- not lead the physician to only one diagnostic option
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
