Q&A: Coding for diagnosis of pregnancy-elevated primary glucose tolerance test
HIM Connection, August 24, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q: Which code should I report for a diagnosis of pregnancy-elevated primary glucose tolerance test? Should I report 790.22 (impaired glucose tolerance test [oral]) or 648.83 (abnormal glucose tolerance, antepartum condition or complication)?
A: Coding Clinic, fourth quarter 2008, pp. 245–252, states:
Obstetric cases require codes from chapter 11, codes in the range 630–679, Complications of Pregnancy, Childbirth, and the Puerperium. Chapter 11 codes have sequencing priority over codes from other chapters. Additional codes from other chapters may be used in conjunction with chapter 11 codes to further specify conditions. Should the provider document that the pregnancy is incidental to the encounter, then code V22.2 should be used in place of any chapter 11 codes. It is the provider’s responsibility to state that the condition being treated is not affecting the pregnancy.
Section G (Gestational diabetes), p. 47, of the ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting states:
Gestational diabetes can occur during the second and third trimester of pregnancy in women who were not diabetic prior to pregnancy. Gestational diabetes can cause complications in the pregnancy similar to those of pre-existing diabetes mellitus. It also puts the woman at greater risk of developing diabetes after the pregnancy. Gestational diabetes coded to 648.8x, Abnormal glucose tolerance. Codes 648.0x and 648.8x should never be used together on the same record. Code V58.67, Long-term (current) use of insulin, should also be assigned if the gestational diabetes is being treated with insulin.
Therefore, you should use ICD-9-CM code 648.83.
Editor’s note: Sandra Sillman, RHIT, PAHM, DRG coordinator at HenryFord Health System in Detroit, answered this question in the August issue of Briefings on Coding Compliance Strategies.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
