Q&A: Coding Clinic vs. coding guidelines: Which takes precedence?
HIM Connection, August 17, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Q: An auditor recently reviewed a chart for an inpatient stay. The patient was admitted due to an intestinal obstruction caused by cancer. The physician did not perform surgery. Hospital staff monitored the patient. The auditor stated that the intestinal obstruction should be the principal diagnosis because we treated the obstruction, not the cancer. Even though we referenced a Coding Clinic that stated that the cancer is the principal diagnosis, the auditor stated that coding guidelines take precedence over Coding Clinic.
A: I agree with the auditor. The ICD-9-CM Official Guidelines for Coding and Reporting always take precedence, and the guidelines direct you to report the obstruction as the principal diagnosis.
Section II of the guidelines states that the principal diagnosis is defined in the Uniform Hospital Discharge Data Set (UHDDS) as “that condition established after study to be chiefly responsible for occasioning the admission of the patient to the hospital for care.”
Also refer to Section I, chapter 2, Neoplasms B. Treatment of secondary site, which states, “When a patient is admitted because of a primary neoplasm with metastasis and treatment is directed toward the secondary site only, the secondary neoplasm is designated as the principal diagnosis even though the primary malignancy is still present.”
Of course, the obstruction is not a secondary neoplasm, but it is a manifestation of the primary malignancy.
Editor’s note: Shelley C. Safian, MAOM/HSM, CCS-P, CPC-H, CHA, of Safian Communications Services in Orlando, FL, answered this question for JustCoding. Safian is a senior assistant professor who teaches medical billing and insurance coding at Herzing University Online in Milwaukee, WI. E-mail her at ssafian@embarqmail.com.This answer was provided based on limited information submitted to JustCoding.com. Be sure to review all documentation specific to your own individual scenario before determining appropriate code assignment.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
