Q/A: Correct coding for unilateral venous Doppler on upper and lower extremity
APCs Weekly Monitor, August 6, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Q: We performed a unilateral venous Doppler on a patient in our imaging center for the right upper extremity. During the same session, we also performed a unilateral venous Doppler for the right lower extremity. I know I can append modifier -RT, but because the way in which a venous Doppler is performed I need to use code 93971 (duplex scan of extremity veins including responses to compression and other maneuvers; unilateral or limited study) twice for the upper and lower extremity.
If I report 93971 twice with the -RT modifier, may I add modifier -59 to one of the studies? It is my understanding that I can’t use the bilateral code (93970) because different extremities (arms and legs) are involved.
A: You are correct, you may not use a bilateral code because bilateral means two sides, and that is inapplicable in this scenario.
I suggest reporting 93971-RT + 93971-59-RT. Include a report to explain that one was an upper extremity and the second was a lower extremity.
Editor’s note: Shelley C. Safian, MAOM/HSM, CCS-P, CPC-H, CHA, of Safian Communications Services in Orlando, FL, answered this question. She is a senior assistant professor who teaches medical billing and insurance coding at Herzing University Online in Milwaukee, WI.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
-
Modifier -59 Case Studies: Clarify Common Coding Confusion
Modifier -59 is a perennial problem area for outpatient coders. It shouldn’t be viewed as a way to guarantee payment but...
-
Outpatient Bed Charge Capture: Billing for Common and Complex Cases
During this 90-minute audio conference, our expert speakers walk you through common and complex cases and explain compliant...
-
Billing No-Cost and Low-Cost Devices: Tips to Avoid the Audit Fast Track
During this 90-minute audio conference, our speakers will use a case study to demonstrate best practices to help you comply...
-
Spinal ICD-9 and CPT Coding
During this two-hour audio conference, our speakers will discuss common coding errors for spinal diagnoses and procedures...
-
2012 OPPS Final Rule: Analyze the Impact and Manage the Changes
Expert speakers Jugna Shah, MPH, and Valerie A. Rinkle, MPA, return for this popular program. They review the final rule...
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched