Tip: Consider security of electronic releases of information
HIM Connection, August 3, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Harry B. Rhodes, MBA, RHIA, CHPS, CPHIMS, FAHIMA, director of practice leadership at AHIMA in Chicago suggests it is best practice for facilities to encrypt electronic copies of records provided to patients. “Many [providers] are looking to use a certificate authority and PKI public key/private key encryption,” Rhodes says, noting that these will mean additional costs.
Some facilities choose to password-protect the information, which is also a good idea, says Jean S. Clark, RHIA, CSHA, service line director for HIM at Roper Saint Francis Hospital in Charleston, SC. Doing so can be a reasonable choice when it comes to protecting information stored on portable media, such as a CD-ROM, as opposed to information sent via e-mail, which may be better secured through encryption, for example.
At the very least, most HIM departments will need to update their existing policies for paper ROI to address the new considerations for electronic releases. Policies should include information on whether a facility will use encryption and password protection. Although those safeguards may be advisable, they are not required.
Facilities need to outline how they will handle the release of electronic protected health information and keep patient information secure. For example, providers must decide whether to encrypt information when HIM staff will be handing the information directly to the patient requesting his or her medical record.
Editor’s note: For more tips, view the full article on the HCPro website. Medical Records Briefing subscribers have access to the article in the August issue of the newsletter.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
