HHS proposes 'significant' changes to HIPAA privacy, security, and enforcement
HIM Connection, July 20, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
On July 8 HHS released a proposed rule to modify the HIPAA privacy, security, and enforcement rules, extending HIPAA compliance requirements to subcontractors of business associates (BA) and strengthening patient rights to health information privacy.
According to the Office for Civil Rights (OCR), which enforces the HIPAA privacy and security rules for HHS, the proposed ‘significant’ modifications include:
- A requirement that BAs of HIPAA-covered entities be under most of the same rules as the covered entities
- New limitations on the use and disclosure of protected health information (PHI) for marketing and fundraising purposes
- Prohibition of the sale of PHI without an authorization
- Expansion of individuals’ rights to access their information and to restrict certain types of disclosures of PHI to health plans
- Provisions that strengthen and expand HIPAA’s enforcement rule
The proposed rule is required by the Health Information Technology for Economic and Clinical Health (HITECH) Act, signed into law by President Barack Obama, February 17, 2009. The Act was part of the $787 billion economic American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which includes provisions for heightened enforcement of HIPAA and stiffer penalties for privacy and security violations.
HHS will receive comments for up to 60 days after the proposed rule’s July 14 publication in the Federal Register, after which it will release an interim final rule. HHS says it will give covered entities and BAs 180 days after the final rule is in effect to comply with most of the provisions.
To read more, visit the HIPAA Update blog.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to HIM Connection!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched