Tip: Take these actions to ensure correct use of modifier -25
APCs Weekly Monitor, July 9, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Modifier -25 indicates a “significant, separately identifiable E/M service by the same physician on the same day of the procedure or other service,” according to the 2010 CPT Manual Professional Edition, p. 529.
Use of modifier -25 requires that the E/M service be above and beyond the usual pre-/post-operative services integral to the procedure. Ensure correct use of modifier -25 by doing the following:
- Conduct an education session to discuss different scenarios when an E/M with modifier -25 would and would not apply. Ensure that anyone responsible for charging the E/M and assigning modifier -25 understands the rules and knows where to go with questions before billing.
- Discuss documentation improvement with nurses and physicians to address modifier -25 questions. There may be circumstances in which an E/M would be appropriate if the documentation could support it. Ensure you are not appending modifier -25 automatically or arbitrarily and be sure documentation to support it actually exists.
- Know whether modifier -25 is built into your chargemaster and understand the risks of this approach. If you leave the modifier attached, a certified coder should review the claims and remove the modifier before billing when its inclusion is inappropriate.
- Perform a random audit of previous claims to identify any problem areas; then post education and perform concurrent and post-billing audits to identify areas for improvement.
- Watch for OIG reports, CMS articles, RAC issues, and MAC audits that allude to a potential modifier -25 problem. Be aware and stay prepared.
This tip is adapted from “Modifier -25: Is That E/M Service Really Above and Beyond the Norm?” in the July issue of Briefings on APCs.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to APCs Weekly Monitor!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
