News: ICD-9-CM code updates available
CDI Strategies, June 24, 2010
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
The new, revised, and deleted ICD-9-CM codes, effective October 1, 2010, are now out. You can find them in a zip file on the CMS website, here: https://www.cms.gov/ICD9ProviderDiagnosticCodes/07_summarytables.asp#TopOfPage
To access the list of initial changes made to the ICD-9 codes, click on the file at the top that says effective 6/10/2010. (Note that the effective date is incorrect: They're actually effective as of October 1, 2010).
The following is a link to the addenda to the index and tabular listing of the codes (scroll to bottom):
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_addenda_guidelines.htm. Note that further changes (e.g., errata) may appear on this page.
http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/icd/icd9cm_addenda_guidelines.htm. Note that further changes (e.g., errata) may appear on this page.
Eventually, these changes will be packaged into a set of final files here: https://www.cms.gov/ICD9ProviderDiagnosticCodes/06_codes.asp#TopOfPage.
The IPPS proposed rule identifies whether certain new diagnoses will be considered CC or MCCs, says Shannon McCall, RHIA, CCS, CCS-P, CPC, CPC-I, CCDS, director of HIM and coding for HCPro Inc., in Marblehead, MA.
Most of the new codes were CCs before, but CMS is adding specificity in some cases by adding a fifth digit, McCall says. For example, Hemoptysis code 786.3 is currently a CC condition, but effective October 1 it gets a fifth digit: 786.30-786.31, and 786.39 (Other hemoptysis). Similarly 999.6 (ABO incompatibility reaction) and 999.7 (Rh incompatibility reaction) are CC conditions which will also receive a fifth digit.
The added specificity for the fifth digit in the V85.4x series may be an opportunity for more specific BMIs to be reported, McCalls says.
“Currently the code V85.4 just says 40+. The additional specificity can identify more specific ranges above 40,” she says.
Want to receive articles like this one in your inbox? Subscribe to CDI Strategies!
Related Products
Most Popular
- Articles
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- Identify potential Medicaid RAC target areas
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Topic: CMS, OESS post new security compliance review information, checklist
- Capturing all necessary codes for IUD insertion and removal can be challenging
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- QA:Coding multiple initial infusions
- OB services: Coding inside and outside of the package
- E-mailed
-
- Q/A: Volume requirement for reporting hydration services
- Featured blog post: Nurses face felony charges after reporting physician to the Texas Medical Board
- HIPAA Q&A: Level of encryption needed for email
- Q&A: Follow CMS' coding guidelines when using modifier -25
- What does case-mix index mean to you?
- Catch up on what's new with injections and infusions
- CMS has reformulated payments for some bilateral procedures
- New conflicts of interest create new challenges
- Q/A. One injection code or two?
- ED-to-inpatient transfers are flawed with safety gaps
- Searched
